From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 29 11:25:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C55E106566B for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@ist.tugraz.at) Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D532B8FC12 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ist.tugraz.at (proxy-music.ist.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.202.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay2.tugraz.at (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5TBOwuS029735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:24:58 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 mailrelay2.tugraz.at q5TBOwuS029735 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1340969099; i=@ist.tugraz.at; bh=rsZ+l7sK9loN0KsdKj/64iDJJzO5qsUxqZ1Vp6cVyRU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Bm9FssyMoNLde1+TjNv4xx6JOrFcpW9GF+L97sFwcAsaiYzHoj9Ns34xb4qANG29N 91kyGMu7XrdN8VNXEG3UBBP5ZG4P/4wIRA5gNaBOAEVx14izsmCFfZhWA5M9U5RxTW ZN6bJZblyUQeXGCEunnHlKBIz6jYTWhCuTIkboOU= Received: (qmail 23812 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2012 11:24:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (129.27.202.101) by ist.tugraz.at with SMTP; 29 Jun 2012 11:24:58 -0000 Message-ID: <4FED9089.2080002@ist.tugraz.at> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:24:57 +0200 From: Herbert Poeckl Organization: TU Graz / IST User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120506 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lepore References: <686121506.2338267.1340842067785.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> <4FEC694C.6060408@ist.tugraz.at> <1340913681.1110.84.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <1340913681.1110.84.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: 5S3planrQ0lSnmWIva+Lkw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003000 X-Spam-Score-relay: 0.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.70 on 129.27.10.19 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need help with nfsv4 and krb5 access denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:25:03 -0000 On 06/28/2012 10:01 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > When something in software works fine with one NIC but not another > (nearly-) identical one, the first thing that comes to my mind is that > the MAC address on the card is being used by the software as a sort of > UUID. I had that happen with a commercial software once; when I changed > NICs in the machine the software stopped working and said it wasn't > registered on that machine. (I would have been annoyed except this > sophisticed "security system" was circumvented by deleting a file that > wasn't even hard to find, and it automatically re-authorized itself on > the next run using the new MAC address.) That came to my mind, too. The thing is, I can set any MAC address I want on both NICs. The result is still the same. The first one is working, the second one not. Greetings, Herbert