From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 8 21:29:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60366106564A; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 21:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:29:44 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <201107072002.16059.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E16D92C.5000508@FreeBSD.org> <201107081623.50665.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201107081623.50665.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107081729.46242.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: [CFT] Update OpenJDK6 to b23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:29:57 -0000 On Friday 08 July 2011 04:23 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Friday 08 July 2011 06:17 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 08/07/2011 03:02 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > > > I have a patch to update java/openjdk6 to b23: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23.diff > > > > > > Please test and report any regression. > > > > Can this update be used as a chance to spin off icedtea web > > plugin into a separate port? > > I was going to do it separately but I think it's clearer. > > IcedTea-Web 1.1 port: > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports.tar.gz > > (Updated) java/openjdk6 patch: > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_1.diff BTW, I have alternative port/patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports_1.tar.gz http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_2.diff Basically, the IcedTea patch for IcedTea-Web is controlled by ICEDTEA option and it is turned on by default. I am not sure which is better. :-/ Jung-uk Kim