Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 May 1996 08:11:42 -0500 (CDT)
From:      "Brett L. Hawn" <blh@nol.net>
To:        Matthew Jason White <mwhite+@CMU.EDU>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Home networks (or 10Base-T ways to annoy your spouse)
Message-ID:  <Pine.SOL.3.93.960507080629.28831B-100000@dazed.nol.net>
In-Reply-To: <wlXhYCK00YUr00yQVp@andrew.cmu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 7 May 1996, Matthew Jason White wrote:

> Excerpts from internet.computing.freebsd-questions: 6-May-96 Home
> networks  (or 10Base-T.. by "Scott A. Miller"@fox.ns 
> > I FOUND IT!  Here's an excerpt from the FAQ posted to the 
> > comp.dcom.cabling newsgroup that should either answer a lot of 
> > questions about cabling with 10Base-T (or else you'll give up the 
> > idea completely...
> 
> I missed the original, but why not use 10Base2?  Really, the cable cost
> isn't that high, more than made up for by not needing a hub.

Beings that I have had to recable a fair number of departments that used to
use 10b2 I have to answer this :)

10b2 is 1: less reliable than 10bT in the fact that at any given time one of
those silly little connectors could just decide to slip off. 2: It tends to
become saturated more quickly even on a net with less traffic that its able
to handle. 3: Due to the looping nature of 10b2 you're likely to find many
more collision on a 10b2 network and finally 4: Its a pain in the ass :) 

Once you've designed and laid out your 10b2 network you're pretty well stuck
in that configuration if you have say more than 2 or 3 hosts. You can add
more and more hosts but eventually you'll have cable strung out across
everywhere. 10bT not only gives you more bandwidth across the ether but
allows for a clean layout and design. rather than having to loop everything
around you'll find a small hub is makes for a nicer and more efficient
method.

Brett L. Hawn

(PS. I'm not a proffesional cabler and my arguments are poorly written,
but.. I think I get the basic point across :))




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.93.960507080629.28831B-100000>