From owner-freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org Mon May 7 02:14:59 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fortran@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184F3FCCE5A for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 02:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890477E6D9 for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 02:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3FA98FCCE59; Mon, 7 May 2018 02:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fortran@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEF1FCCE58 for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 02:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10407E6D5 for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 02:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A0C512A05 for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 02:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w472Eu5n093997 for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 02:14:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w472Euru093995 for fortran@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 7 May 2018 02:14:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fortran@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228007] math/lapack: switch to flang Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 02:14:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jmd@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fortran@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 02:14:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228007 Johannes M Dieterich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmd@freebsd.org --- Comment #7 from Johannes M Dieterich --- As the maintainer of devel/flang I agree with Steve here. flang is a) not y= et ready to replace gfortran (for the reasons Steve discussed) and b) only available for amd64. Personally, I hope this will change eventually and I h= ope we (as in FreeBSD) can help upstream by filing bug reports and vetting the compiler. I assume that you, Steve, filed these 100 internal compiler errors with fla= ng upstream so that we can track progress? Alternatively, could we get the Fortran test suite into the ports tree? I wouldn't mind having that myself to check flang updates. I see as a more viable alternative to get BLAS and LAPACK to Fortran-free implementations and am working on making blis and flame viable. Reference source-code implementations for BLAS/LAPACK are anyways a bad idea to use in production. That'll still leave a bunch of Fortran ports but at least it wo= uld be a start. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=