From owner-freebsd-alpha  Tue Oct 17 21:34:53 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96F037B4D7
	for <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bird (bird.feral.com [192.67.166.155])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA19581;
	Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:34:46 -0700
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Kris Kirby <kris@catonic.net>
Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010180235330.20601-100000@spaz.huntsvilleal.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010172134150.19100-100000@bird.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 
> Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that FreeBSD 4.x
> for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server?

errmm... hard to say. depends on the model. most of the problems seem to be
ones of getting it to go at all. once going, it seems fairly okay.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message