From owner-freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 11:39:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CD89A3CD4 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:39:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from akruijff@dds.nl) Received: from smtpgw.dds.nl (smtpgw.dds.nl [91.142.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED141FEF for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:39:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from akruijff@dds.nl) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (195-241-24-75.ip.open.net [195.241.24.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpgw.dds.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 845637FCA8 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:29:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55A7958F.9000904@dds.nl> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:29:19 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Concerning our new Code of Conduct... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at smtpgw.dds.nl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:39:03 -0000 On 16-07-2015 13:14, Big Lebowski wrote: >> Johannes Jost Meixner writes: >>> I - as a male - feel not only not tolerated, but also discriminated >>> against, >> There are approximately 400 active committers, and not even five of >> those are women. How the *hell* can you claim to be discriminated >> against when you are part of a 99% majority? >> > So you are saying that one person can't complain against other person > actions/behaviour strictly because it is part of some majority? That's like > very sexist (given we're talking about being male/female here) and > discriminative (in general) thing since you're denying him the same rights > simply because he's a male. > He has a point. The following quote is from the movie Philidephia: "This is the essence of discrminiation formulating oppions on others not based on there individual merrits, but rather on there membership of a group with the same charakteristics." Saying you feel discriminated agains implies that you are being juged on your membership of a group. Alex