Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 05:16:10 -0600 From: Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The UFS support of Linux (was: Re: what is the bsd fs called outside the bsd sphere?) Message-ID: <d9175cad041127031661cf4ea1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20041126211027.GA1180@gothmog.gr> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20041124163028.0273b990@cygnus> <20041125112057.GA5113@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <6.1.2.0.2.20041125113137.0272e9a0@cygnus> <41A62DB4.1000306@mukappabeta.de> <20041126211027.GA1180@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:10:28 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote: > On 2004-11-25 20:08, Matthias Buelow <mkb@mukappabeta.de> wrote: > > Richard Williamson wrote: > > > Ok, I'll recreate the original flash image to ensure it is -O 1, and > > > then try again. > > > > in order to mount ufs1 on linux, you also have to specify the > > ufstype=44bsd option to mount. otherwise the mount might succeed, > > but you won't see any files. > > Has anyone checked if the ufs support of Linux works with UFS2 too? Last I had heard, read-only support had been created for Linux. -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d9175cad041127031661cf4ea1>