From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 15 16:38:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEEE1065672 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D34E8FC21 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so435804fgg.13 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:38:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=W/eC4Tl/L+8KB7f9i/V9hlnbJo+jj5hi3qX3SyOb+Ds=; b=r+Tj/yGSvX39fQig9jyvz8/d14YOrXLR1Pzs14s0tDe9VnVbVPzu/ZP/E5JftrRTAM Tz+fv6jy5H8AyqZ5chRSNFD+YvIQHQKuxvdx3eKyov8Y+OIb0HhveeonM3qX1LdJx/Cc Plxrd3xmmIKvbaitL9mZPM8sZ04JfW6Sl+NTU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hWy/cXDxBrkzu7+XIRKhrMsIKeUob9XqpYf0VIKblnwFaKwE5kSZVI7pmGPQTxWlqU sPR61cFTogL43jqOuQg8KTciwvIUqGkbA2Ta2x2PhO7Y8Hyyu/TJ18lulgjP/sX2rgAg PxugeLyGsKZ3c+3Hz3CB5BkOytzqhdCydFXGg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.87.40.2 with SMTP id s2mr8327320fgj.77.1260895100516; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:38:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20091214151318.GC1016@wicklow.lan> <4B274487.7080505@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:38:20 +0000 Message-ID: From: Baptiste Daroussin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: New version of the fakeroot patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:38:25 -0000 2009/12/15 Warren Block : > A suggestion: USE_FAKE is not descriptive. =A0It doesn't tell what is fak= e or > what happens. =A0I'm not sure fake is the even the right word. > > USE_FAKEROOT is better, but still ambiguous: it's not really fake, and > "root" can mean too many things. > > I guess what I'm trying to say is consider a name that describes what is > accomplished, not how it works. > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > I note that, if someone has a better idea for the name. Don't forget the goal of the mail is also to get the people opinion of the usefullness or not of the kind of patch, and you would expect from it, particulary portmgr@ :) regards Bapt