From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 28 20:32:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88614F5; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7302974; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29F014D2516; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:32:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at !change-mydomain-variable!.example.com Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Q6Lnoya8owlF; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.117] (catv-80-99-23-232.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.23.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6404014D250A; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51F57FCC.8090404@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:32:12 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barber Subject: Re: Another CSS suggestion: pre-wrap References: <51F558D2.1010808@FreeBSD.org> <51F56688.5040900@FreeBSD.org> <51F57011.2000603@FreeBSD.org> <51F57C6E.9050608@FreeBSD.org> <20130728202301.GN2272@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <20130728202301.GN2272@glenbarber.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:32:34 -0000 On 2013.07.28. 22:23, Glen Barber wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> >I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these >> >extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is >> >Java-based and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java >> >for PDF rendering, it would be better to keep the XHTML build fast >> >and Java-free so that committers can easily test their work. >> > > Yes, please, let's keep it Java-free... > > IMHO, it is bad enough some of use require use of Java for basic web > browsing. Adding that to a our doc build is a big red bug. What do you mean for basic web browsing? Where is Java required for that? Gabor