From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 29 19:42:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (CDR20-53.accesscable.net [24.138.20.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756D837B479; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:42:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id e9U3eap17623; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:40:36 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:40:36 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Multiple Jail environment(s) on one host ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Morning all ... I'm running 4.x-STABLE on a machine, that I have setup two jail environments over the base system, but the second one is getting the following "errors" generated: Oct 29 22:32:20 mail inetd[97608]: telnet/tcp: bind: Address already in use Oct 29 22:32:20 mail inetd[97608]: ftp/tcp: bind: Address already in use I have portmap disabled in both jail(s) and the base OS, and inetd bound in the base OS to its IP ... do I have to bind inside of each jail to? I thought it got bound only to those IPs that were visible, no? Hrmmm ... if I do a 'telnet localhost smtp' inside of the second env, it gets its own sendmail ... if I do a 'ftp localhost', it gets the ftp server of the first env ... samn thing with telnet, it gets me the first env ... If I add the -a IP option to inetd_flags, I can eliminate the behaviour ... is this the way its supposed to work? Thanks ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message