From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jan 29 18: 7:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from server1.huntsvilleal.com (www.huntsvilleal.com [207.13.224.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891BC151F5 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 18:07:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hiwaay.net) Received: from barricuda.bsd.nws.net (kris.huntsvilleal.com [207.13.224.46]) by server1.huntsvilleal.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA14500; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:51:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by barricuda.bsd.nws.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA91833; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:07:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kris@hiwaay.net) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:07:07 -0600 (CST) From: Kris Kirby To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: delegating ports, interfaces (Re: Multiple IP addresses) In-Reply-To: <200001272330.SAA59699@rtfm.newton> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Yes, would be nice. Perhaps, as a /tcpip file-system? If I want to > special treat a port on one of the interfaces, I just change the > permissions on the file: > > /tcpip/localhost/tcp/ > /tcpip/localhost/udp/ > /tcpip/10.10.0.1/tcp/80 > > However, this is way outside of -stable and FreeBSD in general. Firewall: # rm -rf /tcpip/*/udp ; [etc] --- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. | ------------------------------------------------------- "God gave them the ability to reproduce... ... Science gave us the hope they won't." -KBK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message