From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Aug 19 12:10:11 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id MAA24165
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 19 Aug 1995 12:10:11 -0700
Received: from id.slip.bcm.tmc.edu (hou08.onramp.net [199.1.137.136])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA24149
          for <FreeBSD-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 19 Aug 1995 12:10:08 -0700
Received: (from rich@localhost) by id.slip.bcm.tmc.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA09390; Sat, 19 Aug 1995 13:59:25 -0500
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 1995 13:59:25 -0500
From: Rich Murphey <rich@lamprey.utmb.edu>
Message-Id: <199508191859.NAA09390@id.slip.bcm.tmc.edu>
To: FreeBSD-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: sup/cvs interactions?
Reply-to: rich@lamprey.utmb.edu
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Is it possible that the time stamp on a given file in
/usr/src could ever move backward (become older)?  Could CVS
do this when you revert changes?

Sup ignores files that are older on the server than on the
client, so it wouldn't pick up this kind of change.

I'm seeing this once in a while.. Rich