From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 17 08:01:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880ED1065676; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE8A8FC33; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F047167CA92; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:00:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wtfBFQ7W1NUW; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:00:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC83C67C952; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:00:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m3H80lc5063800; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:00:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:00:47 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20080417080047.GC62998@freebsd.org> References: <200804161256.56633.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20080416172825.GA81674@freebsd.org> <20080416223801.T19507@ns1.as.pvp.se> <20080416213317.GB25623@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080416213317.GB25623@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add stubs for Linux 2.6.17 syscalls X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:01:11 -0000 > Note that last time I checked we didn't support enough 2.6 syscalls to > run common binaries though (e.g. a recent fedora rpm(1)). can you be more specific? what was missing? I plan to switch to 2.6 on default quite soon so I wonder... thnx!