From owner-cvs-lib  Sun Jan  5 13:24:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-lib>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA15377
          for cvs-lib-outgoing; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 13:24:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA15352;
          Sun, 5 Jan 1997 13:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA17626; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 14:24:12 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 1997 14:24:12 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199701052124.OAA17626@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@freefall.freebsd.org>
Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit:  src/lib/libpcap Makefile
In-Reply-To: <199701051825.KAA08898@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <199701051825.KAA08898@freefall.freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Garrett Wollman writes:
> wollman     97/01/05 10:25:54
> 
>   Modified:    lib/libpcap  Makefile
>   Log:
>   Fix Makefile so that dependencies are actually right this time.
>   It is almost always the wrong thing to put .y and .l files directly
>   into the SRCS.

The original CSRG Makefiles always did this, so why do you consider it a
bad thing?



Nate