From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 07:42:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E9B1065670 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD8A8FC08 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA17791; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:42:57 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1OwVay-00088h-VV; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:42:56 +0300 Message-ID: <4C931C00.3070803@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:42:56 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100912 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <4C4DB2B8.9080404@freebsd.org> <4C88944C.5060603@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C88944C.5060603@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-currrent@freebsd.org Subject: amd64: VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE changed to 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:42:59 -0000 on 09/09/2010 11:01 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 26/07/2010 19:07 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> >> Anyone knows any reason why VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE on amd64 should not be set to 1? >> I mean things potentially breaking, or some unpleasant surprise for an >> administrator/user... > > So, after having the discussion, what is our collective conclusion? > a) Go for it! > or > b) Don't do it, fool! > or > c) Let's wait another year... Nobody said (b), so: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=212784 This thread in Gmane for your convenience: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.architechture/13419/focus=13551 -- Andriy Gapon