From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 19 2:14:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (ppp-224-156.usc.edu [128.125.224.156]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781BE37B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:14:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26B7666BD5; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:14:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 02:14:15 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: ravi prasad Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TCP/IP daemon. Message-ID: <20010319021415.A4554@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010319075536.16821.qmail@nwcst283.netaddress.usa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319075536.16821.qmail@nwcst283.netaddress.usa.net>; from raprasad@usa.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:55:36AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:55:36AM -0700, ravi prasad wrote: > Dear sir, > As we know ftp,tftp,login etc are together in the inetd daemon. It occured to > me that the entire tcp/ip stack could be implemented as a daemon.Kindly mail > me if this is possible. If not possible kindly specify me the reasons. I suppose you could do that, but performance would probably suck, and you'd have to hack up a lot of the kernel. Kris --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6tdv3Wry0BWjoQKURApbgAKDv0mCam23hVp/IGvYILVVaDkNd9wCeMMIA RdA8//XbmN0cyBAXDHY+e0E= =vAUZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message