From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 19 19:37:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rebel.net.au (rebel.rebel.net.au [203.20.69.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C03150F0 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 19:37:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kkenn@rebel.net.au) Received: from 203.20.69.74 (dialup-4.rebel.net.au [203.20.69.74]) by rebel.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id MAA17798 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 1999 12:05:20 +0930 Received: (qmail 9298 invoked from network); 20 Jul 1999 02:35:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (kkenn@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 1999 02:35:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 12:05:14 +0930 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway Reply-To: kkenn@rebel.net.au To: Wes Peters Cc: Keith Stevenson , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAM & LDAP in FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <37939F8E.7B9E0E16@softweyr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Wes Peters wrote: > > Given that this is a PAM module, wouldn't /etc/pam.conf be more appropriate? > > /etc/pam.conf would be appropriate for configuring the behavior of PAM > modules. /etc/auth.conf would be appropriate for configuring WHICH > authentication method to use. Let's please don't confuse the two. In my work on modularizing crypt() (which is almost ready for another alpha release) I'm using login classes in /etc/login.conf instead of system-global settings in /etc/auth.conf to decide password hash schemes. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message