From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Tue Sep 15 18:01:53 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FC4A04C54
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:01:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net)
Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4724C1202
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:01:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net)
Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net
 [75.65.60.66])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3nFsZt4lNzz1Gy;
 Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:52:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100)
 id 3nFsZt1GrXz2x2; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:52:22 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:52:22 -0500
From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
To: Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Missing "Local system status"
Message-ID: <20150915175222.GG1709@over-yonder.net>
References: <20150915080318.GA89697@server.rulingia.com>
 <55F811F1.7040202@pix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55F811F1.7040202@pix.net>
X-Editor: vi
X-OS: FreeBSD <http://www.freebsd.org/>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23-fullermd.4 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:01:53 -0000

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:41:21AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kurt Lidl, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> So the real argument ought to be if rwhod/ruptime ought to be part of a
> different MK_xxx,

I think Peter's point is that 430.status-rwho shows uptime(1) info
too, if rwhod isn't writing out data for it to ruptime(1), so it's
still useful even without r*.  Which also means it's slightly
misnamed, but...


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.