Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 13:20:52 +0100 From: Julien Cigar <jcigar@ulb.ac.be> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: redundant firewall Message-ID: <20151204122052.GH13477@mordor.lan>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mtfogggI1YmpIpmy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I bought 2 Soekris 6501 in order to setup a redundant firewall (with Freebsd 10, CARP, and PF).=20 Let's say I don't need remote access to each individual boxes from the=20 WAN side, I wondered if it's really necessary to bind "real" IPs to=20 each interface involved in the CARP alias? I'm asking this because I don't have enough public IPs... Thanks! Julien --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --mtfogggI1YmpIpmy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJWYYUgAAoJEAi2KiTKQR5p1wgP/iiEBKBWeDZUHVNmMSr/7XxO CtPIRxnxEby+ts7OeQoESzk4wlqdocJ5BNSx2CANZ6rncG+RuZulbz0BfIkVSW/n G3gHsLeXHGF4YtnzgjwHtK5swOFpyaPl2ztLO7ivsVnCvF7Z7fdtJCKQvn4q9Vf8 X9E5xy/eujJvCHYIyOB+aXEW4RSjgFRJZX4J5COml0AZ3wixUeRpC5aMyaN7R82i +DeXwr3xElbOY7zZ9fNzh2veefJeGMO/K1NWb/uon0o8swjfdUS3Ol5Uy/o14ojL FVo11uLmrknNRlxxClaOG4BfJA15lhJrS/R5PebyqmiunPNVIJNsiR4e6FearPfI 6sXI4sYMrXQQ/SkBUBZatyh1Rq4cQxWeGJZT/JcARJu9tDwCs/OV0bg3khZCz2PQ O/tpRTDbhHQm1+mK52761y7lOlr5WQu/WJGUh7jrM34YdUy9UCL6WqI9z4vKr/La TtKbP51Hl8yXQxhvBBspyMlZ/B/kgqruTDlA4RXyjoKT8kxPUnO+xayaxi5OHAqZ 1VFG09Eeta6Aoj+aQ02vxGJgDHi0ga5dhNBJTE9fVSmi55llH4D8M3LM478qjTvb XttKHukkuak2qrmZsO0Bgax2m9nLRo+Fi61ZNePsm12PIHzsr9cbqmoxsO5vecJW +F7iZrSsvbWDL9h+73lj =zlHe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mtfogggI1YmpIpmy--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151204122052.GH13477>