From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 11 01:53:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CEF16A417 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B33913C4B3 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 23888 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2007 01:52:50 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 11 Nov 2007 01:52:49 -0000 Message-ID: <4736603B.7070800@chuckr.org> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:51:55 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= References: <20071109222421.037E116A494@hub.freebsd.org> <20071109224531.GA58036@wjv.com> <4734EA16.5090800@chuckr.org> <86hcjuglzz.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86hcjuglzz.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bv@wjv.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a better lesskey helper X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:53:23 -0000 > > None of that will happen. You are free to use your own lesspipe.sh on > your own system, or install sysutils/most from ports, but the base > system's lesspipe.sh will not change, LESSOPEN will not be defined in > the default environment, and zless will stay. > OK. That's, I guess, what I was after. It seems that some folks have lost my point, which was to see if there was any support for improving the currently installed lesspipe.sh. Since we already had one, and the changes are clearly useful to programmers, it seemed a likely bet, but if you're that dead set against it, OK, it's dropped. I got suggestions from several folks to do things like go look up other less users, but they didn't see that wasn't my intention, I wanted to see about improving our lesspipe.sh. I actually still disagree, but it's surely not worth any more discussion. It's dropped. I'll just maintain my own here. Easy enough to do. > DES