From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 11 16:52:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA25144 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 16:52:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA25116; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 16:52:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA05995; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:52:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id RAA01846; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:52:00 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:52:00 -0700 Message-Id: <199802120052.RAA01846@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, msmith@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Bumping the minor number on the library? X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Since stringlist.c was added to libc, shouldn't be bump the minor number of the library? This just bit me when I updated, and adding new functionality to a library implies to me a minor number bump. If there are no complaints, I'll do that in 24 hours, unless Mike beats me to it. (He was the person who added the files). Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe stable" in the body of the message