From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb 19 23:23:37 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA01334
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 23:23:37 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA01323
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 23:23:31 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com)
Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.186.218] 
	by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1)
	id 0y5mnw-0006Ui-00; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 23:23:28 -0800
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 23:23:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: pthreads vs. pthreads
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980219232054.4737A-100000@shell.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


  I have an application which requires pthreads that I'd like to use on
FreeBSD 2.2.5-stable

  Which is better, libc_r or mit-pthread?  I think that the libc_r
stuff had some compatibility problems.  What is the status of this stuff
in 2.2.5-stable?

Tom


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message