Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:45:40 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>, Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r349818 - head/www/nginx Message-ID: <420326ED029C08B3A7A7A37C@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <C72A0BB6-90BF-4456-ABD1-5F51AD352946@FreeBSD.org> References: <201404010040.s310e5en074822@svn.freebsd.org> <5342F077.8000105@freebsd.org> <C72A0BB6-90BF-4456-ABD1-5F51AD352946@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+--On 8 avril 2014 09:32:42 -0500 Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> wrote: | | On Apr 7, 2014, at 13:37, Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> wrote: | |> On 04/01/14 02:40, Mark Felder wrote: |>> Modified: head/www/nginx/Makefile |>> ======================================================================= |>> ======= --- head/www/nginx/Makefile Mon Mar 31 23:25:50 2014 (r349817) |>> +++ head/www/nginx/Makefile Tue Apr 1 00:40:05 2014 (r349818) @@ -3,7 |>> +3,7 @@ |>> |>> PORTNAME= nginx |>> PORTVERSION= 1.4.7 |>> -PORTEPOCH= 1 |>> +PORTEPOCH= 2 |> |> Was that a mistake? |> | | I'm not entirely sure, but maybe I misunderstood the behavior. Here was | the chain of events: | | - Update made to www/nginx that should require a PORTREVISION bump | - Couldn't bump PORTREVISION and remove PORTEPOCH | - Bumped PORTEPOCH instead You should have bumped PORTREVISION and stopped there, not touching PORTEPOCH :-) -- Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420326ED029C08B3A7A7A37C>