From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  4 13:23:32 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9D76116A4CE; Thu,  4 Dec 2003 13:23:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com
	[66.75.162.134])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BAC1243FF3; Thu,  4 Dec 2003 13:23:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sean@mcneil.com)
Received: from blue.mcneil.com (cpe-66-75-176-109.socal.rr.com
	[66.75.176.109])hB4LNViF006905;	Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:23:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [66.75.176.109] (mcneil.com [66.75.176.109])
	by blue.mcneil.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB4LNUm3028230;
	Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:23:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sean@mcneil.com)
From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
To: gnome@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Sean McNeil Consulting
Message-Id: <1070573010.28210.1.camel@blue.mcneil.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:23:30 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC-NIET-Metrics: blue.mcneil.com 1080; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
cc: DougB@FreeBSD.org
Subject: xscreensaver
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:23:32 -0000

Hi all,

Can we remove the --without-pam from xscreensaver and xscreensaver-gnome
now?  It cripples systems using LDAP.

Thanks,
Sean