From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 22 09:47:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA07473 for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 09:47:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA07344; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 09:47:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (IDENT:Hb5zVxxfS8A6Pc6UsBa9EAq8vrkFaJ/h@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA05532; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:46:09 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199809221646.SAA05532@gratis.grondar.za> To: Scott Mace cc: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami), max@wide.ad.jp, markm@freebsd.org, committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: perl5 on -current In-Reply-To: Your message of " Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:48:48 EST." <199809221548.KAA17481@metal.intt.org> References: <199809221548.KAA17481@metal.intt.org> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:46:07 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Scott Mace wrote: > Another perl5 issue would be how do we handle perl5 > ports? > > alot of ports are wanting to install manpages, etc in > /usr/share/perl/man.... my understanding is that ports > go under ${PREFIX} not under /usr... Should this be > any different for perl5? Grrr... Yet another reason for my current abject hatred of perl5. We'll need to fix this, and I don't have any smart answers apart from brute-force hacking of the port's sources. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org