From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 04:15:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70DB16A435; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E33F43D5C; Fri, 12 May 2006 04:15:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4C4D0Fk054750; Thu, 11 May 2006 22:13:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:13:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20060512.001308.126925417.imp@bsdimp.com> To: jhb@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200605111952.57682.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4464020F.3000609@freebsd.org> <446403FE.8050908@freebsd.org> <200605111952.57682.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, andre@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 04:15:19 -0000 In message: <200605111952.57682.jhb@freebsd.org> John Baldwin writes: : On Thursday 11 May 2006 23:41, Andre Oppermann wrote: : > Bruce A. Mah wrote: : > > If memory serves me right, Andre Oppermann wrote: : > >> andre 2006-05-12 02:54:03 UTC : > >> : > >> FreeBSD doc repository (src committer) : > >> : > >> Modified files: : > >> en index.xsl : > >> Log: : > >> Alpha has left the building. Add ARM and rearrange the list of : > >> architectures a bit. : > > : > > I wonder if the !alpha part was a little premature? Yes, the alpha : > > kernel bits are gone from HEAD, but they're still around on RELENG_5 and : > > RELENG_6, and we're still planning to do releases from both of those : > > codelines. The first release that won't include alpha will be 7.0, and : > > its release cycle doesn't even *start* for over a year. : > > : > > Just a thought... : > : > There are like two remaining Alpha users and we most likely won't gain : > any new ones in the foreseeable future. Though we are compiling releases : > according to jhb it isn't even clear they actually work on Alpha. It's : > not actively maintained anymore. It really has left the building and there : > is no point in advertising it on our homepage instead of on some random : > tombstone somewhere out in the past architectures graveyard. : : There are more than 2 users, but when users report problems those problems : aren't really resolved. I think Alpha should stay on the main page until it : is officially retired when 7.0 is released. We also shouldn't mention arm : until it's actually "included" in a release which it is not yet. arm was in 6.0 Warner