From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 13:42:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37744C2C for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06835647 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:42:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=uhGXwihLNqNIf4n9UZa9Byd1BChZTit9OMLVYl3d9oI=; b=N82Oubrl9dWfI5NcQ8aKS0kPBvEoTwtUhBwjXe7dXy1MRgz7AJHdDpvl0XWnUVgmGXjfPSHvUHU1F8qPOP0lAsg/g2R4gRMnrmgNGEbSZaM94Qwas1uc18nJxdWVbI6xyoXjHKHssjyWEmddETZTT2+63tWVdAtufEusdZ2Cz98=; Received: from [114.124.6.0] (port=58859 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Xv4lk-003wR9-Db; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 06:42:33 -0700 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 21:42:09 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: Darren Pilgrim Subject: Re: OT: UPS for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20141130214209.78a99653@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <547A24F7.6070100@bluerosetech.com> References: <54777AB1.9010800@bluerosetech.com> <54779629.302@bluerosetech.com> <5478BD4F.7020306@yahoo.com> <5478BEE6.30308@bluerosetech.com> <5478CC08.9090307@yahoo.com> <20141128204722.561f948e@archlinux> <5478F16A.80605@yahoo.com> <54791d3a.w/pI0kak03d+3nKC%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <547937AB.1030706@radel.com> <20141129121211.014cb856@X220.alogt.com> <547A24F7.6070100@bluerosetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:42:35 -0000 Hi, On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:56:39 -0800 Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 11/28/2014 8:12 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Real high voltage transmission > > lines using DC make sense. > > Someone already tried that. It doesn't work. The conductors have to > be impractically large to get a useful amount of current, and the > distance loss is so high you can't build even a metro grid with it, > let alone a regional grid or the long-distance transmission systems > we use now. it does not work? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current It is a pretty common thing meanwhile. It is used only inside the networks and consumers never get a direct contact to the DC part of it. Erich