Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:23:34 +0300
From:      abi <abi@abinet.ru>
To:        Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ports test system setup
Message-ID:  <575D3826.7060609@abinet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20160612101913.GA41922@home.opsec.eu>
References:  <57587D08.90009@abinet.ru> <64d969fb-f604-68c1-fe61-52013db957a0@FreeBSD.org> <575D362E.7030206@abinet.ru> <20160612101913.GA41922@home.opsec.eu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My question was that poudriere testport tries to build port 
automatically. What to do if I want some manual steps with port sources 
between make extract and make patch steps ? I'm asking about 
interactivity with port testing.

On 12.06.2016 13:19, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> OK, I installed 11-a2 and poudriere. Now I'm running testport, however I
>> have a question - poudriere wiki describes situation where developer
>> patches port and runs it to test. This looks like final precaution
>> before commit to port tree.
>>
>> What if I don't know yet what to patch, but need to experiment a little?
>> I want 'make extract', then patch by hand, then try to compile. Is it
>> possible?
> I do this kind of testing in the 11 environment ('loaded with other ports')
> and only if it builds there, I copy the patched port to the poudriere tree
> and run the testbuilds there.
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?575D3826.7060609>