Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:29:16 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@obspm.fr> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setfib mount Message-ID: <4D8AE4BC.4080900@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110323100504.GA8779@obspm.fr> References: <20110322131435.GA5792@obspm.fr> <4D890905.9010000@freebsd.org> <20110323100504.GA8779@obspm.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/23/11 3:05 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > Le 22/03/2011 à 13:39:33-0700, Julian Elischer a écrit >> On 3/22/11 6:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> Sorry for the cross-posting. I don't known which list is the best. >>> >>> I'm using freebsd-jail since 5.x and yesterday I upgrading (from 7.3 to >>> 7.4). >>> >>> I've see the setfib working now pretty well with the jail. So I using two >>> routing table. One for the host, one for the jails. >>> >>> But I don't known why the NFS mount (on the host of course) didn't use the >>> 0 routing table. So when I try to execute the mount the connection start >>> from the second interface. If I do >>> >>> setfib 0 mount >>> >>> every thing work fine. >>> ssh vps1 >> does your jail mount anything? >> > No. > > The mount is on the host. so then I too am not sure why the mount itself would use the second FIB. is it possible that some of the mounting is being done automatically by rc scripts using /etc/fstab in the jail? > Regards. > > JAS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D8AE4BC.4080900>