Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:20:02 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 860ce9aee61a - main - security/picocrypt: Whitelist 64-bit archs Message-ID: <YzMGkgS6cd5DOy0P@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAFDf7UKEx5oAN56uAAZfqoQA-%2BiwqL2EK=YOP9=uu3h2TBg%2BZg@mail.gmail.com> References: <202209261903.28QJ3knH012930@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <YzJhmTSTQ7Sr240j@FreeBSD.org> <CAFDf7UKEx5oAN56uAAZfqoQA-%2BiwqL2EK=YOP9=uu3h2TBg%2BZg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:50:51PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hello Alexey,
>
> Yes you are right, blacklist is shorter and best option to use since list
> will be smaller in the future.
>
> NOT_FOR_ARCHS= i386 armv6 armv7 mips powerpc powerpcspe
>
> Coul you take a look before I commit?
Looks complete to me (I originally forgot about powerpc{,spe} in my first
reply but Piotr had corrected me later).
On a more general note, it would be nice to have 32BIT_ARCHS list provided
for us by the b.p.m (64-bit one is less useful as it's, well, pretty much
everything else now and in the foreseeable future).
./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YzMGkgS6cd5DOy0P>