From nobody Tue Sep 27 14:27:56 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4McMQh2bbBz4d6n8; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@anongoth.pl) Received: from mail.anongoth.pl (mail.anongoth.pl [46.248.190.61]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X448 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "anongoth.pl", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4McMQf2F4Gz3c5v; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@anongoth.pl) Received: from anongoth.pl (unknown [192.168.1.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pkubaj@anongoth.pl) by mail.anongoth.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87F261BAE66; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:27:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=anongoth.pl; s=ANONGOTH; t=1664288838; bh=Q2eflvWe9ozpYuxPH+LLAcm48gJXkNdKqGhIJrgGK9E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=dbeTup89SVTro5uDt/l9gmsByQIqrpkhe4WgMoFOzdWbDYTJcCP8rA/UJ5pKxazRN PUJWhpSWpz/2fe/54u0DXpUi9dsKzH701g0PLmxho7W0q2IiZqC2tH/zus2CvCQTlo KC42aPbt3hPLLUec1SG8l9QbeSXM18TL8V7aoJotpYBlM/YDgAf+vPLjU0kzKfRY54 KBUx/sEKmETOMgqO71e3zF3+SAU126luiUtQFQ8ZfpCMxUc66/WPeoymyz5qoty45U l4BnWd7/6IR6tV7PX5eOjIun+oDWEc0jAD68MVp2CC2KiNT3EfwUrBAFnEqNOkkeA7 CvB/0bpiWwPUw== Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:27:56 +0200 From: Piotr Kubaj To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Nuno Teixeira , "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" , dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 860ce9aee61a - main - security/picocrypt: Whitelist 64-bit archs Message-ID: References: <202209261903.28QJ3knH012930@gitrepo.freebsd.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nxsM+WqFZUghsTBM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4McMQf2F4Gz3c5v X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=anongoth.pl header.s=ANONGOTH header.b=dbeTup89; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=anongoth.pl; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pkubaj@anongoth.pl designates 46.248.190.61 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pkubaj@anongoth.pl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.60 / 15.00]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[anongoth.pl,reject]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[anongoth.pl:s=ANONGOTH]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:46.248.190.61]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org,dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:47544, ipnet:46.248.160.0/19, country:PL]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[anongoth.pl:+]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pkubaj]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --nxsM+WqFZUghsTBM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22-09-27 14:20:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:50:51PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello Alexey, > >=20 > > Yes you are right, blacklist is shorter and best option to use since li= st > > will be smaller in the future. > >=20 > > NOT_FOR_ARCHS=3D i386 armv6 armv7 mips powerpc powerpcspe > >=20 > > Coul you take a look before I commit? >=20 > Looks complete to me (I originally forgot about powerpc{,spe} in my first > reply but Piotr had corrected me later). >=20 > On a more general note, it would be nice to have 32BIT_ARCHS list provided > for us by the b.p.m (64-bit one is less useful as it's, well, pretty much > everything else now and in the foreseeable future). >=20 > ./danfe +1, I was thinking of the same. And another list, for big-endian architectures. --nxsM+WqFZUghsTBM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEycyIeNkkgohzsoorelmbhSCDnJ0FAmMzCGwACgkQelmbhSCD nJ0Eww//bZ60KWdmuKCmm6d2kevrkbEOzTrKgJQUlGPQwBVVhRbJe1sgKYS09tGZ 2AKVaXZ765L6uCR9NqnCjngQs29LG7Z2ynD2+bqwwCoMqN026I3urcVN8RReMN8/ WLHmTDwiUSLqNMKZVHm5whDWHTbG028JpuZNRDJ9mVseNycycRxBC573sHeuguHR QgOwWqjtRkuxBvf9n30+gzvQk7B2F3FULD07SOLSbW8EpuUby2sUwSo1/rKoBjF5 hrZ60XeLDVBuGVu0XMgvNub8t62rQfZGeSGcqnSeuclACiVvFIaeq90DXG1XoX1G w1aTvmAbRlmZ0ekQ6mC9zyO+BcAbLkpzVmugsIUOwstRyzU+xi1SZdaf7Iu/3koU XuLMWzYwg/rQV0xmIcmBVQ8P8WrQsFk23WUb1JfQSTyHLUSM+g5HurAdPmqGEdOY /9PIvr8qbitnCcqjVGgWkigfh9erBsLt8lbD16UKl3kF/q4oUAwQm4h3OjrjDksh eMaU7x2ninG3GOjwB8FSN5bQBuRUWOJB01suwkCmkp5YgAQsRnCmqE1wIRVKIrLS okKV0TFIAiDL/E+yr3204EeEkp41BKvave9Ux1TE2B28x/jpiQ65sRxgCAAHkM7m sErWUMdBLQpJss2whs8Wfx+483RoaWDilu5koGeZX5zQbTtl2RU= =3WPn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nxsM+WqFZUghsTBM--