Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:45:57 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Nokia CA-42 cable Message-ID: <20060212224557.GV86448@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060212.141458.01469052.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20060212162841.GR86448@cell.sick.ru> <20060212.093447.74725815.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060212164650.GT86448@cell.sick.ru> <20060212.141458.01469052.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 02:14:58PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: M> : W> That ID is radically different. uplcom is a good first choice. M> : W> However, maybe you could try each of the drivers. I know freebsd M> : W> makes this a pain, but it is the only way to be sure we don't support M> : W> it. M> : M> : Ok, I will try this. Or may be I should follow Linux source and see M> : how it distinguishes device type? M> M> Maybe. According to documentation, Linux uses the generic serial USB driver to handle a unknown device, when IDs are supplied as arguments to insmod. That is drivers/usb/serial/generic.c in Linux src tree. How do you think what is the corresponding driver in FreeBSD or NetBSD? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060212224557.GV86448>