From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 19 11:08:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9C416A421; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C490E43D45; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 90F4022DE4; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:08:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:08:17 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: Edwin Groothuis , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060519110817.GU93253@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org References: <200605190910.k4J9AthA057344@freefall.freebsd.org> <24823738@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519102325.GF1116@k7.mavetju> <58748084@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519110250.GB1103@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060519110250.GB1103@k7.mavetju> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.4-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Subject: Re: ports/97488: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:08:19 -0000 --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:02:50PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: >=20 > The ports Makefile says: the maintainers email address is > freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org. Big problem here, that's not a real > person. But how can a script know this? No way, except from hardcoding the few aliases. >=20 > If I assign it to portmgr for a repocopy, I'll get the PR back in > my lap when the repocopy is done, not netchild@. In the mean time > (and sorry for the noise), netchild is old and wise enough to know > how to assign this PR back to himself :-) >=20 Repocopies are special. There is no real concept of a maintainer as after the repocopy, in principle, it's a new port and could have another maintainer as the old one. Also, when the PR is assigned to portmgr, portmgr will need a committer to sign the PR back to after the repocopy is done. I'd say, if the PR originator is a committer, just sign it right over to portmgr. If not, assign to the maintainer and/or wait for a committer to pick it up. -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// erwin@FreeBSD.org And it makes you cry. <____) (____> erwin@aauug.dk --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEbachqy9aWxUlaZARAl4vAJsFq1fSKBPVmu3hAR8Sye5ExYxZYACg2cGk BB2f62IxclQ5ojQvwvQzNbs= =39RC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN--