From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 11 15:18:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CD537B401 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:18:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lilzcluster.liwest.at (lilzclust01.liwest.at [212.33.55.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BAD43F75 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:18:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from CM58-27.liwest.at by lilzcluster.liwest.at (8.10.2/1.1.2.11/08Jun01-1123AM) id h3BMI220000784488; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:18:02 +0200 (MEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Daniela To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:18:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200304120018.02702.dgw@liwest.at> Subject: PECOFF support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 22:18:05 -0000 Hi all! I have some questions about the PECOFF_SUPPORT kernel option: When I include this, can I run the PECOFF executables directly (given tha= t the=20 files needed by the program are there) without other programs? Is there any reason for not doing so (especially security-related)? Daniela