From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 21 14:09:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7103316A4DF for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33C5943D49 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 35825 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2006 14:09:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.178.2?) (a.premoli@andxor.it@81.174.31.42) by andxor.it with SMTP; 21 Mar 2006 14:09:29 -0000 Message-ID: <44200918.6000101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:09:28 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ahze@ahze.net References: <441FFF0C.4010107@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using ccache with make world X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:09:32 -0000 michael johnson wrote: > I think everything looks good Good :-) > but is there not some overhead by > using a shell script in world-cc and world-c++? Yes, hashing the compiler can also create a little overhead, but compared with the overall speed gain of making world and the time saved to reply to users in trouble I think it's more than acceptable. > I'm not sure that there > would be a better way of doing what you want than what you have now > though. Perhaps with a deeper integration of ccache in the /usr/src Makefiles, I cannot see another simple way with the ccache port. -- Alex Dupre