From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 20 23:35:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1411065672 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0FA8FC14 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3KN1xik033949; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:01:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p3KN1xRk033946; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:01:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:01:59 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4DAF5FBA.8080304@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <4DAEAE1B.70207@FreeBSD.org> <20110420203754.GM85668@acme.spoerlein.net> <4DAF46F8.9040004@FreeBSD.org> <4DAF5FBA.8080304@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:01:59 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD-Current , Alexander Motin Subject: Re: Switch from legacy ata(4) to CAM-based ATA X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:35:27 -0000 On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/20/2011 15:18, Scott Long wrote: >> I agree with what Alexander is saying, but I'd like to take it a step >> further. We should all be using [...] mount-by-label > > +1 > > When I first saw this on linux my gut reaction was "ewwww, different." But > now that I've worked with it a bit, I really like it. Doing this by default > in 9.0 would be a really useful step forward, and would allow greater > innovation down the road. > > Is there a handy tutorial somewhere for making this change in FreeBSD? Or is > it even possible to do in a rational way? Not sure I understand the question. I have a little article called FreeBSD Labeled Filesystems: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/labels.html It uses filesystem labels instead of device labels (except for swap). The differences are the utility used to create the labels and where the labels show up in /dev.