From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 18:24:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AABF1065672 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com) Received: from mail.redfish-solutions.com (mail.redfish-solutions.com [66.232.79.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692D58FC21 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from macbook.redfish-solutions.com ([192.168.1.17]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q57IOiBj008397 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:24:44 -0600 Message-ID: <4FD0F1EC.4060109@redfish-solutions.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:24:44 -0600 From: Philip Prindeville User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <1D03F00E-2777-4B0B-8E1C-860EA115B6AF@lurchi.franken.de> <7731AEE8-D1BF-4297-8F75-454149D3E303@lurchi.franken.de> <5A4A73CF-95FB-4B33-9652-2E4FD517CF5F@lurchi.franken.de> <5399FCC6-BDC4-47DD-9948-ADD16264EE46@lurchi.franken.de> <8D7E9322-0973-4657-B3FE-8A480C0E0304@lurchi.franken.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 192.168.1.3 Subject: Re: IP_RECVTOS X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:24:45 -0000 It might be nice to add a semantic that says, "when accepting connections, match their TOS"... possibly adding ranges of permitted TOS values. On 6/6/12 4:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > *nod* sure, I just want to be sure that it's clearly documented what > the option does. > > If it just does UDP for now and not TCP, then so be it, as long as > it's documented that way. > > > > Adrian