From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 28 20:28:56 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA07714 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 20:28:56 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA07708 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 20:28:43 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id UAA00183; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 20:28:41 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id UAA00465; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 20:28:06 -0800 Message-Id: <199511290428.UAA00465@corbin.Root.COM> To: Robert N Watson cc: freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.1.0-RELEASE, bpfilter w/CAP problem In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Nov 95 23:02:38 EST." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 20:28:01 -0800 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >I upgraded from 2.0.5 to 2.1.0 this afternoon -- I was running CAP to >provide appleshare for then LAN I'm on, but when I recompiled the 2.1.0 >kernel with pseudo-device bpfilter 12, the bpf's failed to attach to my >ethernet device on boot. I deleted the /dev's for bpfilter, bpf0-11, >and recreated them, and still no improvement. It simply skips attaching >them to ed0 (and any other device). I did a strings of my /kernel, and As of FreeBSD 2.1, the bpf attach messages are only displayed with the -v (verbose) boot option. >the bpfilter code is definitely in there, as I get several bpfilter >related messages. When CAP tries to use bpf0, it gets a device not >configured error. Yes, I did copy in the new kernel source :). Hmmm. It should work... -DG