From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 13:39:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A57216A41F for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38C843D67 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:39:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so211985nfc for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:39:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=E2hElVcwh+VLiJn9/i+Qa5dzoJBQpuQZSZ8WNJlI5Qg+5IsaVnhEK64GKam/sLtQzdUTCdg8XYM4HKFpKrA4ZfAr7ytCSepNtK2ZZ4a0Li7cicsRG1syanxvNagEVtxB4v9kHyM/WAucFkZT6eZHs/2/le9ZQAyEcKK9chvvBwE= Received: by 10.48.239.18 with SMTP id m18mr158249nfh; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.239.6 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:39:02 +0100 From: Freminlins To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <200508151320.j7FDKCVq025507@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200508151320.j7FDKCVq025507@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Cc: Lei Sun , questions@freebsd.org, cpghost , Glenn Dawson Subject: Re: disk fragmentation, <0%? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:39:06 -0000 On 8/15/05, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > As someone mentioned, there is a FAQ on this. You should read it. >=20 > It is going negative because you have used more than the nominal > capacity of the slice. The nominal capacity is the total space > minus the reserved proportion (usually 8%) that is held out. > Root is able to write to that space and you have done something > that got root to write beyond the nominal space. I'm not sure you are right in this case. I think you need to re-read the post. I've quoted the relevent part here: =20 > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/ar0s1e 248M -278K 228M -0% /tmp Looking at how the columns line up I have to state that I too have never seen this behaviour. As an experiment I over-filled a file system and here's the results: Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1f 965M 895M -7.4M 101% /tmp Note capacity is not negative. So that makes three of us in this thread who have not seen negative capacity on UFS. I have seen negative capacity when running an old version of FreeBSD with a very large NFS mount (not enough bits in statfs if I remember correctly). > ////jerry Frem.