From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 9 07:42:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA15660 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 07:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (maccs.dcss.McMaster.CA [130.113.68.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA15648 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 07:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from church.dcss.mcmaster.ca by maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #5) id m0u6ecW-0005wOC; Tue, 9 Apr 96 10:42 EDT Received: by church.dcss.mcmaster.ca (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA03295; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:42:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:42:10 -0400 From: dsantry@maccs.dcss.McMaster.CA (Douglas Santry) Message-Id: <199604091442.KAA03295@church.dcss.mcmaster.ca> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd threads Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I don't know who to send this to so I thought the general hackers address would be a start. I am currently implementing user threads that are managed by the kernel so multithreading is possible. I am *not* multithreading the kernel. It will still only allow one active task in the kernel at a time. I am using syscalls 172-175 and 177-180. If this is a problem please let me know. I am checking with you folks cuz I thought you may be interested in including this code in your general distribution one day. Are these syscalls ok or should I move them? PS I can't seem to find the code for libc. I can only find man pages for libc under /usr/src/lib/libc/sys which I find kinda strange. Where should I be looking? If anybody is interested in what I'm doing send me a note and I'll give more details. Doug Santry dsantry@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca Does anybody know a person who know the virtual memory layout really well? I could use some info.