From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 26 6:12:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from c007.snv.cp.net (c007-h008.c007.snv.cp.net [209.228.33.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDF1437B422 for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 06:12:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from otterr@telocity.com) Received: (cpmta 22259 invoked from network); 26 May 2001 06:12:30 -0700 Received: from dsl-216-227-91-85.telocity.com (HELO zoso) (216.227.91.85) by smtp.telocity.com (209.228.33.214) with SMTP; 26 May 2001 06:12:30 -0700 X-Sent: 26 May 2001 13:12:30 GMT From: "Otter" To: "Jonathan Chen" , "Simon Lai" Cc: Subject: RE: RSS=245Mb with 256MB of RAM? Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:10:14 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010525090041.A34494@itouchnz.itouch> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG good point. and with removng all unnecessary services, do you really need portmap? if not, i'd recommend adding a line to your rc.conf that looks something like: portmap_enable="NO" maybe try adding some more RAM too. Give the application some elbow room to work with. -Otter -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Jonathan Chen Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:01 PM To: Simon Lai Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RSS=245Mb with 256MB of RAM? On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 02:02:17PM +1000, Simon Lai wrote: [...] > 2. Eliminated all unused device drivers in the kernel, > and removed NFS, CD file systems etc ... maxusers > is set to 3. The maxusers in the kernel config doesn't actually limit the number of users allowed on the system. It actually provides a yardstick to the kernel about the table-limits it should set up. By setting it such a low number, I suspect you may have crippled something... Just my stab in the dark here. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "If you wish your merit to be known, acknowledge that of other people" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message