Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:47:59 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr, FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Idea for next portupgrade Message-ID: <486D2CEF.6020709@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <18540.55980.938489.721330@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20080702232551.GA3204@pcjas.obspm.fr> <486CD2E8.50505@FreeBSD.org> <18540.55980.938489.721330@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Huff wrote: > Sergey Matveychuk writes: > >> > If portupgrade can calculate the depency and launch many ports >> > build in same time for non-depending ports it's can be >> > wonderful. >> >> I'm sure it's a good idea. I'd use it too. But I have a very >> little free time with my current employment. So I can't implement >> it. Sorry. > > It is also my understanding that ruby (used to manage the > ports database) a) is not re-entrant and/or b) does not lock the > files it is using/changing. Having two instances running at once > causes Bad Things(tm) to happen. > > > Robert Huff Correct, this is on the Project Ideas page....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?486D2CEF.6020709>