From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 28 03:16:13 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDDE1065673
	for <gecko@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AC18FC1B
	for <gecko@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id EA7C28C088; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:58:32 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:58:32 -0500
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: "Thinker K.F. Li" <thinker@branda.to>
Message-ID: <20100728025832.GA27119@lonesome.com>
References: <201007280207.o6S27Tff010728@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20100728.103550.191449660.thinker@eeebox.branda.to>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100728.103550.191449660.thinker@eeebox.branda.to>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/148104: [NEW PORT] www/libxul: Mozilla runtime package
	that can be used to bootstrap XUL+XPCOM apps
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues <freebsd-gecko.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gecko-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gecko-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gecko-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:16:13 -0000

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:35:50AM +0800, Thinker K.F. Li wrote:
> When is it available?  I am waiting for 1.9.2 for monthes.  That is
> why I submit this PR.

Hmm, ok.  You titled it 'new port', which we use for 'port that does not
exist yet in the ports tree'.  I was looking for PRs for 'new ports'
where the port already existed.

The last comment was from decke@ on Jun 24 (which was during our most
recent release cycle), where he said he and the other gecko@ folks
were working on a different update.  Now the 8.1 is out, I suggest
we give them a little time to work on it.

fwiw, for updated ports, we prefer PRs to be in diff -ruN format, so
that we can more easily see what changed.

mcl