From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jun 10 17:56:33 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA02251
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.254.239.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA02246
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mellon@localhost) by toccata.fugue.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with SMTP id RAA28219; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:56:29 -0700
Message-Id: <199606110056.RAA28219@toccata.fugue.com>
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Swapped ethertype in BPF output? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:41:00 PDT."
             <199606110041.RAA19384@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> 
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:56:29 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> Eek, and now that I look at it, the HP RMP length field is in the
> same place as ethertype ... So, rather than the "more than one
> place" (been a long day), why don't we say "there are precedents for
> kludging around the bug"... :-)

Sigh.   So it would seem.   Still, I feel like I might as well lean a
little - this is definitely bogus.

			       _MelloN_