From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:03:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C566C378 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC2BE95F for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t12G3k8D068147 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:03:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196185] emulators/hyperv-is: Update Hyper-V ports for FreeBSD 10.1 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:03:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:03:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196185 John Marino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marino@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #9 from John Marino --- This is a patch to the source code, not a patch to the port. I see the last attachment is a "shar" of the entire port. In theory patches could be generated by comparing that to the current port. However, submitting "shar" instead of patches is not easy for anybody. Actually, these three attachments are causing me a great deal of confusion. Attachment 1: patch, Dec 23, seems to patch source Attachment 2: patch, Dec 23, seems to patch port but doesn't reference attachment 1 patch Attachment 3: shar, Jan 13, seems to replace port. It would help this PR along if: 1) all unnecessary attachments are designated "obsolete" so they get hidden and don't add to confusion. 2) Make sure patches to the port itself are present. 3) most importantly: poudriere logs for every platform to verify this port builds on all advertised platforms. I see "internal testing" is implied, but we want to see external testing, e.g. poudriere for verification purposes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.