From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 17 11:28:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA18564 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 11:28:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from netra.graphnet.com (netra.graphnet.com [192.206.112.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA18537 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 11:28:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from romank@graphnet.com) Received: from graphnet.com (roman.graphnet.com [192.206.112.93]) by netra.graphnet.com (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA12886 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 14:27:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <35D877EB.182AA3BC@graphnet.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 14:35:23 -0400 From: Roman Katsnelson Organization: Graphnet, Inc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "q's" Subject: DNS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, This isn't strictly a FreeBSD question, and I am sorry. But I couldn't find any DNS group that would even let me in, let alone answer a question. On Friday, I changed some DNS info on our server. Today, some servers know about this and others don't. That it, nslookup yields the old result on some. Is this normal, or should I change something to make it propagate faster? Thanks, and I'm all apologies, Roman -- /*******************************************\ * Roman Katsnelson romank@graphnet.com * * UNIX Engineer Member of www.wait.org * * Graphnet, Inc. http://www.graphnet.com * \*******************************************/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message