From owner-freebsd-arch  Sat Oct 26 14:15:16 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D655837B401
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from InterJet.dellroad.org (adsl-63-194-81-26.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.194.81.26])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3FF43E4A
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from archie@dellroad.org)
Received: from arch20m.dellroad.org (arch20m.dellroad.org [10.1.1.20])
	by InterJet.dellroad.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA45760;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arch20m.dellroad.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arch20m.dellroad.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9QLA2ON036251;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from archie@arch20m.dellroad.org)
Received: (from archie@localhost)
	by arch20m.dellroad.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9QLA2p6036250;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>
Message-Id: <200210262110.g9QLA2p6036250@arch20m.dellroad.org>
Subject: Re: Renumbering IPPROTO_DIVERT
In-Reply-To: <200210262053.g9QKrHMd036105@arch20m.dellroad.org>
 "from Archie Cobbs at Oct 26, 2002 01:53:17 pm"
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, julian@elischer.org,
	arch@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Archie Cobbs writes:
> > >I think though that there should be a "compat" shim that
> > >does the right thing but is VERY NOISY.
> > 
> > What's the right thing?
> 
> How about just always returning an error?

Sorry, should have been clearer. I meant that -current without the
shim should return an error (for a transition period), to help flag
programs that need to be updated.

-Archie

__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs     *     Packet Design     *     http://www.packetdesign.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message