From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 11:09:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E93916A4D0 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:09:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1090743D5A for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:09:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20040123190919014005h2sse>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:09:19 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2AAB511; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:09:19 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Michael Whitley" References: <000c01c3e1db$d1bd2ff0$0f8a23a6@open.wcomnet.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 23 Jan 2004 14:09:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <000c01c3e1db$d1bd2ff0$0f8a23a6@open.wcomnet.com> Message-ID: <44oesueb34.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:09:24 -0000 "Michael Whitley" writes: > I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of > Spamassassin have fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl > version. I noticed that there is a SpamAssassin 2.6 port out for > freeBSD 4.9 but was wondering if anyone has had success with > installing it on a 4.8 system? I reported (within the last few days) such a problem with the port against -STABLE, but it was fixed within hours. 4.8 uses the same perl as 4.9 (5.005_03), so it's vastly unlikely you'll have any problem with 4.8. Of course, 4.8 isn't officially supported by the latest ports, but I don't think you should have any problems. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public"