From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 20 18:10:38 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B139B16A4CE; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:10:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 877B643DBD; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:10:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (pav@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4KIAbP8085951;
	Fri, 20 May 2005 18:10:37 GMT
	(envelope-from pav@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from pav@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4KIAbCX085947;
	Fri, 20 May 2005 18:10:37 GMT
	(envelope-from pav)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 18:10:37 GMT
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200505201810.j4KIAbCX085947@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, ale@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/80915: MySQL port building requires -O on 4.x releases
	and 4-STABLE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 18:10:38 -0000

Synopsis: MySQL port building requires -O on 4.x releases and 4-STABLE

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ale
Responsible-Changed-By: pav
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 20 18:09:15 GMT 2005
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Over to maintainer to decide

In my opinion, if someone changes default CFLAGS, he knows what he's doing
and should be ready to bear consequences. I don't think port should hold
user's hand

Plus included patch will kill any user provided optimizations, like -O2 or -O3.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80915