From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 19 13:24:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAC016A4D0 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:24:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B2F43D49 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:24:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 12672 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2004 13:24:54 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Jul 2004 13:24:53 -0000 Received: from slimer.baldwin.cx (slimer.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6JDOh6g012030; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:24:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: Colin Percival Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:21:45 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <200407161557.i6GFvGWg003796@repoman.freebsd.org> <200407161542.40585.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <6.1.0.6.1.20040716143932.040665d0@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.1.20040716143932.040665d0@popserver.sfu.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407190921.45189.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_prot.c src/sys/sys systm.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:24:54 -0000 On Friday 16 July 2004 05:44 pm, Colin Percival wrote: > At 12:42 16/07/2004, John Baldwin wrote: > >On Friday 16 July 2004 11:57 am, Colin Percival wrote: > >> Log: > >> Add a SUSER_RUID flag to suser_cred. This flag indicates that we want > >> to check if the *real* user is the superuser (vs. the normal behaviour, > >> which checks the effective user). > > > >Could we rename PRISON_ROOT to SUSER_PRISONOK or some such to be > > consistent? > > I'd be happy to do this; should I simply add the new name, or should I > make the substitution across the entire tree? I would ask Robert's opinion. :) I would vote for adding the new name and changing it across the tree and add in a #define for the old name that is inside #ifdef OBSOLETE_IN_6 or some such so it is deprecated for 5.x and gone in 6.0. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org